Part 4: The Oldest Piece of Art
While in Tübingen, Germany visiting
Kayla, I had an opportunity to wander up to the town’s castle (every town in
Germany has a resident castle, it seems) and see the outside of the
archaeological museum up there, which houses the oldest piece of recovered
human art, dated at 32,000 years old. I didn’t see the artifact itself, but saw
a much larger rendition set up outside the museum entrance. The piece—a horse
missing its legs—isn’t striking so much for its aesthetics or its design as the
giant leap in thought it must have taken in order to make it in the first
place.
Imagine: a world in which food
and shelter are not entirely dependable and craftsmanship like metallurgy would
probably have best been served to forging hunting weapons and other tools. But
rather than spend time creating those precious commodities, a craftsperson sat
down and created an essentially ‘useless’ object.
A larger representation of the earliest recovered piece of artwork; photo by Taylor Coe |
But it’s not simply the object
that the individual is after; it’s something in the experience of the craft.
For this particular craftsperson, I tried to imagine that feeling—that
transitory sense of moving past the practical into the impractical, from necessity into art (which I, of course, would
argue is also a necessity—though a
necessity of a different order).
I tried to imagine their
thoughts: “Today I will begin a fruitless and painstaking crafting process. I
will make something that is not a tool. It is not useful. It barely begins to
serve as a representation of a real horse. Its function is to satisfy something
that we have not even named yet: a desire beyond the body, beyond the scope of
the everyday world, beyond mere existence.”
No comments:
Post a Comment